Every distillation setup has a signature note that it imparts on oils distilled in it. Whether it be a Borneo or a Burma, the hallmark 'style' of the oils will be identical. You can tweak things like soak, raw materials etc, but the way the oils will behave on the skin, their general clarity, depth, development, top- or middle- or base-note predominance and the unmistakable 'signature' of the setup will invariably be the same. This is why whatever Taha distills, as an example, will carry his signature 'style'—clean, clear, top-note dominant. Give the same raw materials to me: Do you expect to get an identical oil? Taha may give you Royal Malinau, while I might opt to crank out Malinau Extreme, shifting the focus to the depth rather than the crest of the profile, sharpening the contrast between top and middle and base, and not filtering out the more traditionally 'agarwoody' fractions of the oleoresin. It is, at the end of the day, a question of personal taste.
Ceen and Fragrant Harbor speak the same language to me. They are brother and sister batches that were likely distilled in the same apparatus, by the same hands. The 'system' is the same. The 'signature' is the same. And, believe it or not, the raw materials are pretty similar. Fragrant Harbor smelled a bit more refined due to perhaps greater exposure to air, but at the end of the day I'd have to agree with Josh on this one: they're eerily similar beasts.
Ceen and Fragrant Harbor speak the same language to me. They are brother and sister batches that were likely distilled in the same apparatus, by the same hands. The 'system' is the same. The 'signature' is the same. And, believe it or not, the raw materials are pretty similar. Fragrant Harbor smelled a bit more refined due to perhaps greater exposure to air, but at the end of the day I'd have to agree with Josh on this one: they're eerily similar beasts.