Unfortunately, it’s time for me to step in:
As a public forum, members should not feel restrained from voicing negative feedback. The aim of this forum is to dissect information and, as this thread’s title explains, we have a platform for a detailed discourse of oud. Seeing that not all ouds and outlets were created equal, suspicion is for many of us the default position we take to oud. That will inevitably entail criticism. However, that does not mean the decorum of the discussion should be jeopardized. Criticism is welcome, provided it be voiced respectfully.
The manner in which this debate has been brought up and the way it has escalated since then could have been approached more wisely, especially the unexpected and forthright manner in which Taherg instigated the topic. That being said, the topic raised is valid and has its place in a discussion forum where the question of purity is part and parcel of the substance at hand. If members feel any particular claim directed at any particular oud is absurd or unfounded then they are free to counter the claim, politely, and request the needed back-up.
As for the animosity directed towards Taherg from other members, his reputation will be affected thereby. As somebody with a history posting relevant and beneficial knowledge previously, on other forums as well, he knowing put his name on the line. That’s for him to deal with. But objectively, the contents of his post did not violate any forum rules and is not essentially a negative contribution. Although the tone of his posts, and the reactions against them, have been counter to the impeccable decorum we have seen here so far, I don’t feel the theme raised is counter to the spirit of a public, educational, forum and therefore don’t see reason enough to delete any threads, posts or ban anybody quite yet...
HOWEVER: The current topic is closed. Any further back and forth will be deleted. What has been said so far will remain, except that I will remove some of the 'name calling'. Members here will not tolerate any personal attacks directed at anybody, no matter how personal or heated the discussion may get. The question of blackmail and what went on behind the scenes between buyer and seller is personal and does not provide sufficient reason to disregard an unrelated concern being addressed, i.e. the contents of a perfume, and neither does this kind of discourse have any place here.
So. no further comments or rebuttals or accusations that pertain to this particular topic are necessary or useful from hereon out and will be deleted, so let’s all get back on track.
Thank you all. Now, if you will all excuse me, it’s time for my afternoon swipe…
As a public forum, members should not feel restrained from voicing negative feedback. The aim of this forum is to dissect information and, as this thread’s title explains, we have a platform for a detailed discourse of oud. Seeing that not all ouds and outlets were created equal, suspicion is for many of us the default position we take to oud. That will inevitably entail criticism. However, that does not mean the decorum of the discussion should be jeopardized. Criticism is welcome, provided it be voiced respectfully.
The manner in which this debate has been brought up and the way it has escalated since then could have been approached more wisely, especially the unexpected and forthright manner in which Taherg instigated the topic. That being said, the topic raised is valid and has its place in a discussion forum where the question of purity is part and parcel of the substance at hand. If members feel any particular claim directed at any particular oud is absurd or unfounded then they are free to counter the claim, politely, and request the needed back-up.
As for the animosity directed towards Taherg from other members, his reputation will be affected thereby. As somebody with a history posting relevant and beneficial knowledge previously, on other forums as well, he knowing put his name on the line. That’s for him to deal with. But objectively, the contents of his post did not violate any forum rules and is not essentially a negative contribution. Although the tone of his posts, and the reactions against them, have been counter to the impeccable decorum we have seen here so far, I don’t feel the theme raised is counter to the spirit of a public, educational, forum and therefore don’t see reason enough to delete any threads, posts or ban anybody quite yet...
HOWEVER: The current topic is closed. Any further back and forth will be deleted. What has been said so far will remain, except that I will remove some of the 'name calling'. Members here will not tolerate any personal attacks directed at anybody, no matter how personal or heated the discussion may get. The question of blackmail and what went on behind the scenes between buyer and seller is personal and does not provide sufficient reason to disregard an unrelated concern being addressed, i.e. the contents of a perfume, and neither does this kind of discourse have any place here.
So. no further comments or rebuttals or accusations that pertain to this particular topic are necessary or useful from hereon out and will be deleted, so let’s all get back on track.
Thank you all. Now, if you will all excuse me, it’s time for my afternoon swipe…